 |
On Classical Education... |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Introduction
|
|
The word
"classical" or "classic" is used in many
contexts and often without specific meaning: classical music,
classic rock, etc. However, classical usually means something
that through time has proven worthy of our respect and interest.
In music, the work of certain composers has been recognized as
worth saving, while that of others, though popular in their day,
has been tossed aside into the dust-bin of history. The same is
true of books. Some books are more worthy of study than others
because of the profundity and clarity with which they express the
ideas they contain.
The study of the great
books has been the backbone of good education for centuries. If
you look at the books read by the intellectual giants in our
culture, you find that particular books come up again and again.
These books were required of most school-children until the rise
of Dewey and the institutionalization of education through the
public school system in the first half of the 20th century.
But with increasing
interest in classical education in recent years there has been a
revival of the Christian intellectual tradition. Classical
education differs from most educational philosophies in that it
attempts to step back from the parade of pedagogical theories and
ask: "What was education like in the past? What books were
used? What goals were thought important?"
|
|
The Lost Tools
of Learning
|
|
Dorothy Sayers, in her
well-known essay "The Lost Tools of Learning," answers
these questions, giving us some very sage advice for education in
our own day. She began by investigating the medieval model of
education and found that it was composed of two parts. The first
was called the Trivium and the second, the Quadrivium (which was
generally "post-secondary").
| Trivium |
The Trivium contains three areas: Grammar, Dialectic, and
Rhetoric. Each of these three areas suits a specific stage of a
childs mental development.
|
| Grammar Stage |
During the early years, a child studies the Grammar portion of
the Trivium. The Grammar period (ages 6-11) is based on
memorization and the acquisition of foundational facts. During
their younger years children possess a great natural ability to
memorize large amounts of material even though they may not
understand its significance. This is the time to fill them full
of facts: multiplication tables, geography, dates, events, plant
and animal classifications anything that lends itself to
easy repetition and assimilation by the mind. The Grammar stage
lends itself to the study of language, especially a classical
language such as Latin or Greek, which requires much memorization
of grammatical structures. |
| |
|
| Dialectic or Logic
Stage |
During the second period, the Dialectic (ages 12-14), the
childs greater reasoning ability prompts him to ask
questions based on the information gathered in the Grammar stage.
The child no longer sees the facts he has learned as merely
separate pieces of information. Through questioning, he begins to
develop logical relationships between facts. |
| |
|
| Rhetoric Stage |
The third period Dorothy Sayers mentions is that of Rhetoric
(ages 14-16). At this age, the child moves from merely grasping
the logical sequence of arguments to learning how to present them
in a persuasive, aesthetically pleasing form. Sayers also calls
this the Poetic age, because expression becomes as important as
logical content. In the Rhetoric period, students more inclined
towards mathematics and science or literature and the humanities
can pursue the area of their natural abilities. |
| |
|
|
|
"Learning
to learn for oneself"
|
|
This certainly
well-summarizes the pedagogical goal of classical education;
however, once equipped with the ability to learn, where does a
student go from there? To be able to learn for yourself does not
mean that you no longer need a teacher, but rather that you are
capable of making books your teachers without the aid of an
instructor to explain them to you. In our day and age we are
quite impressed by the number of years one has to spend in the
academic institutions obtaining degrees. The ancients, however,
would probably have thought our institutions poor since they are
not producing graduates who are capable of easily learning
independently. As Sayers states in the conclusion of her essay,
"The sole true end of education is simply this: to teach men
how to learn for themselves; and whatever instruction fails to do
this is effort spent in vain."
If we ask, "Which
books are worthy teachers?" the answer usually depends on
who we are or what we are attempting to learn. If, however, the
question is, "Which are the truly great books?" there
is actually fairly broad agreement. There are books that through
history have shown enduring value (Greek and Roman literature,
the Bible, various literary authors, etc.). Through time certain
books have generally come to be viewed as central to the
development of western culture and have had an unusually large
impact due to the profundity and eloquence with which they have
expressed their ideas. These books form the core of the western
intellectual tradition; it is the ideas contained in them that
have formed the saga known as western history.
Anyone who desires to
understand the cultural milieu in which they have been raised
should read these books. In order to come to a self-conscious
understanding of the ideas that have shaped the culture around
us, we need to face the ideas at the source from which they came.
Francis Schaeffer had an excellent sense for the top-down flow of
ideas. He explained how ideas began with the philosophers, worked
down through the universities, into the popular media and finally
into the general culture. Because ideas progress in this manner,
it is necessary to become acquainted with ideas at their fount,
so that we may understand their manifestations in our present
culture. Thus, the reading of the great books serves an important
apologetic function for Christians, and in education, the forming
of future Catholic leaders.
We live in the continuum of
western history. In order to evaluate this stream of which we are
a part, we must step back from it and discern the ideas that have
shaped it. To attempt to ignore the ideas that have shaped our
cultural history is to guarantee ourselves not only cultural
irrelevance but also entrenchment in the Christian ghetto. Not
only do we want our children to avoid intellectual
impoverishment, but we also want to honour the God who needs his
children to be courageous, and grateful by embracing their
potential.
|
|
|
|
|
|